If you’re reading this review of Fear Street: Part 3 – 1666 because you wanted to know if you should watch the whole trilogy, I’ll give you your answer:
Yes.
You absolutely should watch them; see them in order. My previous positive statements didn’t give the movies enough credit, and 1666 retroactively improves 1978. This review is going to be full of spoilers going forward.
For those still here, let’s talk about the ending of Fear Street.
The biggest hint of a hidden fourth movie was that 1666 moved at a blistering pace—too quick for the runtime. It comes and it goes with a hammer blow of a narrative.
But let’s look at that narrative—and why it worried me at first. The time shift was so different it felt like it would derail the entire tone of the series. Reusing the old cast, while a clever trick to maintain empathy with familiar faces, also took some acclimation. Some of the accents not being the best didn’t help.
But I should have trusted the creators more than I did. They knew what they were doing. They subverted the entire series’ simple premise. They pull the rug all the way away.
It’s such a good twist it elevates even 1978 in my eyes. Those repetitions of the witch’s curse appear to be a deliberate sleight-of-hand. It even catapults the underlying themes of class struggle into overwhelmingly explicit messaging that retroactively informs everything.
But let’s talk about the witch plot of 1666. As my first actual criticism in this article, those beginning bits are the weakest part. I’ve seen the witch hunt, mass hysteria, and resulting victimization of innocent women plot played often. They do it effectively bleak enough and stylish enough, sure. And the message is still poignant as ever. But the scene with the preacher and the eyes (and some fun editing) is the only thing undercutting a mostly standard delivery. The tension’s fine, the pacing is great, but it’s typical horror.
I also question how Sarah Fier cursed the Goode family. She’s not a witch, and the whole point is she has no magic—and was a scapegoat. But it’s a nitpick, and in a world of zombie serial killers, it’s easy to accept ghosts as a general thing. It has to be this way for the plot to hold.
This brings us to the second “half” of the movie—where all that setup coalesces magnificently. The amazing choices just keep coming. The first movie’s convenience store scene already sold me on how fun the multiple killers were, but this takes it to another level. It hadn’t occurred to me to have them fight each other. But once it started, I was cheering. It’s a fantastic scene amongst fantastic scenes. By the time the characters are in the mall, there’s so much going on, so many plot threads moving and twisting simultaneously—and it was full of tension and uncertainty and delightful outcomes.
I have only two major complaints about the whole ending, and they’re only letdowns because of how much love and care went into the rest of the writing. As far as I recall, no other time have possessed people been able to fight the possession. It’s a cheap trick to circumvent tension at such an important moment. Having Sam get loose and fight Deena was a spectacular choice, but they could’ve resolved it any other way. Same issue with how Nick Goode loses. Why would Satan’s evil slime cause a negative reaction for him? Deena and others, sure, but Nick works for the Devil.
And, yeah, these are nitpicks. But they’re nitpicks that stand out because of how good everything else is. How much it earns every other ending. Rarely would a horror movie have a happy romance, but it’s warranted here. And if that sequel bait pays off in another movie—well, I’m game to watch and review it.
Because Fear Street has been a delight. I’m so glad I watched all these movies. They’re wonderfully gory, surprisingly clever, and a delightful way to modernize an older subgenre. It has likable, understandable, and varied characters and gets how to make a horror movie fun. Sure, it never quite loses the negatives of its heritage, and it has a few low points pacing-wise, but it powers through.
This series is proof you can revitalize old franchises in a great way. It shows the benefits of planning and having faith in an entire trilogy before releasing any of it. I can think of few reasons to not recommend Fear Street, and hope for many more R. L. Stine adaptations.
Possibly Related Posts:
The Wild Robot is, simply put, almost as perfect an animated movie as there could… Read More
Generic blue cards see a lot of use, and clearly, Foundations planned for that. Because… Read More
In our last Friday Fiction, dear reader, we had a science fiction tale where a… Read More
Foundations is going to be around for a long time—and I’m honestly super happy with… Read More
I fear repetition in my review of Rouge Protocol. At this point, it’s clear that… Read More
What does that title mean? Well, dear reader, I’m afraid I cannot tell you. The… Read More
Comments